search
Loading
|  home | feedback | help          
StarChefs

archive
* Michelin Survey Results

Letter From the Editor Vol.6

Does Michelin Matter?

October 2006

Last week Michelin released its 2007 guide to New York City’s restaurants and hotels. StarChefs was invited to moderate a panel to discuss the release of the guide, featuring Jean-Luc Naret, the director of the guide, restaurateur Barry Wine, and food journalists Bryan Miller and Pascale leDraoulec. After a discussion of challenges, processes, history and future of the Michelin rating system and guide, we left the panel asking ourselves: does Michelin matter in New York?

Fine dining chefs and restaurateurs say yes, especially those raised or trained in Europe, where the red guide reigns supreme. As do Asian and European tourists, who use the guide to map out their visits. But the jury’s still out with the New York dining public. The average New Yorker is still not likely to pick up a guide when deciding where to eat out, if only for the basic reason of timing – Michelin is just not current enough, or at least not as current as the many other sources of weekly, even daily, information better equipped for the city’s constant state of flux. In tackling New York, Michelin faced the challenge of adapting to the lifespan of the city’s restaurants; which often all too short in comparison to the majority of the restaurants featured in the European guides.

The rigorous inspection process that includes 8-12 visits to each starred restaurant is what makes Michelin so prestigious and, in New York, what threatens to make it out of date. The fluidity caused two major exclusions from the 2007 guide: Gilt, set to receive two stars but cut at the last moment due to a changing of the guard, and Alain Ducasse at the Essex House, which was not included because it will be closed for renovation and relocation in January. StarChefs was surprised that Aquavit, L'Impero and Alto did not receive stars, and even more shocked that Sumile was excluded all together.

In its current yearly form, Michelin admittedly has trouble getting their arms around the lifespan of a typical NY restaurant and the mood of the typical NY diner. The reading list of a food-savvy New Yorker headed out for dinner can include City Search, NY Times, the New Yorker, New York Magazine and Time Out, to name a few. And for a printed yearly guide, American diners are more likely to turn to Zagat’s. Of our New York readers, only 10% use the 2006 Michelin guide often, and 50% don’t use it at all, compared to 75% that turn to Zagats (see the Michelin Survey Results). So added to the issue of timeliness of print vs.online media is that of local competition, which in a market as scrutinized as New York, is a force to be reckoned with.

So what’s next for the guide? Naret hinted at expansion to other cities but refused to give any leads. Michelin’s future in America depends on what it’s looking for. If it’s revenue, one of the high-profile international tourists spots (Washington DC or Las Vegas) should be next. If it’s publicity, then New Orleans. But if its aim is to recognize culinary excellence and solidify a reputation as a serious gastronomic guide to America, we expect Chicago or Boston would most likely be next on the list.

 

Cheers!
Antoinette Bruno
Editor-in-Chief

 

 


reply to Antoinette Bruno, editor in chief, starchefs.com become a friend of StarChefs on Facebook tell a friend about StarChefs

 

^ Top of page


   
 Sign up for our newsletters!|Print this page|Email this page to a friend
 QuickMeals   Chefs   Rising Stars   Hospitality Jobs   Find a School   Wine   Community   Features   Food Events   News   Ask the Experts   Tickets   Cookbooks
About Us | Career Opportunities | Media Kit | StarChefs in the News | Site Map
Please help keep StarChefs a free service by displaying our button on your website. Click here for details.
  Copyright © 1995-2014 StarChefs. All rights reserved.  | Privacy Policy