Re: Closing time policies


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Newsgroup ]

Posted by bob on April 13, 2001 at 17:54:51:

In Reply to: Re: Closing time policies posted by michele on April 13, 2001 at 07:07:56:

: : IT TOOK YOU OVER 2 MONTHS TO POST THAT RESPONSE? STOP BEATING A DEAD HORSE. I PERFECTLY AGREE WITH THE OTHER PEOPLE REGARDING SERVICE - AND THAT'S REGARDLESS OF WHAT TIME THEY COME IN. THIS THREAD WAS ALREADY DEALT WITH IN JANUARY. WHAT ON OR OFF THIS EARTH POSSESSES YOU TO CONTINUALLY HARASS PEOPLE ON THIS FORUM? WAAAH WAAAAAAAH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!! >:P~~~

:
: lol.. yes... i came here every day for 2 months to figure out the ideal way to post a response! I wander in here about every two months to see if any brain-dead ignorant people post anything here... they usually don't... but if they do, i post my response.

: So let me get this straight.... it would be a-ok if i posted AGREEING with all of these people, but since i have an opposing viewpoint, my opinion is seen as harrassment? Do you know what it means to 'harrass' someone, bob?

: I just post responses to maybe give people an explaination... a reason why those things may happen. To help them to see things from another perspective because i always see things from all sides. Humans are so damn self-involved...

: poor bob. he resorts to ALL CAPS and spell checking posts to get his jollies! It's ok bobby boy, we all get our 15 minutes honey... yours are bound to come up eventually.

: michele
------
>:*( BOO HOO! HERE WE GO AGAIN. APPARENTLY _YOU_ DON'T KNOW THE DEFINITION OF "HARASSMENT"--YOU JUST DID IT (AND ALWAYS DO)! --PER MY MERRIAM-WEBSTER DICTIONARY, HERE'S THE MEANING OF "HARASS". I'M SURE _YOU'LL_ FIND DEFINITION 3 PUZZLING
"ha•rass \he-"ras, "har-es\ vb [F harasser, fr. MF, fr. harer to set a dog on, fr. OF hare, interj. used to incite dogs, of Gmc origin] 1 : exhaust, fatigue 2 : to worry and impede by repeated raids 3 : to annoy continually syn harry, plague, pester, tease, bedevil.
HAVING A DIFFERENT VIEWPOINT ABOUT A TOPIC IS ONE THING---THAT'S OPINION. BUT WHEN YOU FORCE THAT VIEWPOINT ON EVERYONE ELSE AND BASICALLY TELL THEM IT IS FLAT OUT W R O N G TO FEEL OTHERWISE AND THEN RIDICULE THEM AND "ANNOY CONTINUALLY" IS HARASSMENT. THAT'S ALL YOU SEEM TO BE DOING ON THESE FORUMS. I HAVE NOT READ 1 POST FROM YOU WHICH WAS IN A NON-OFFENSIVE OR FRIENDLY MANNER. I READ THE POSTS HERE A LOT AND BELIEVE ME, I FIND IT PLEASING TO READ THE NON-BITCHING POSTS, AS I'M SURE EVERYONE ELSE DOES. YES, THIS FORUM IS FOR COMPLAINTS, BUT A COMPLAINT DOES _NOT_ HAVE TO BE IN THE FORM OF HARASSMENT. PEOPLE ARE SIMPLY POSTING THEIR OWN VIEWS IN A _CIVILIZED_ UN-CAVEMAN LIKE MANNER. YOU CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP THAT CONCEPT. IN ONE POST, YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT YOUR JOB AND HOW YOU HATE THE PEOPLE YOU ARE SERVING, BUT IN THE NEXT BREATH, YOU SAY HOW MUCH MONEY YOU MAKE AND THAT YOU ARE HAPPY. YOU CAN'T EVEN MAKE UP YOUR DITZY LITTLE MIND! AND BY THE WAY, I DON'T HAVE A SPELL CHECKER FOR MY INTERNET, BUT I'M GLAD
YOU NOTICED THAT I CAN SPELL ALL BY MYSELF AND DON'T NEED TO INSULT SOMEONE ELSE OR "HARASS" PEOPLE TO PROVE IT. (YOU MADE QUITE A FEW SPELLING ERRORS. 1-YOU MISSPELLED "HARASS" BY ADDING ANOTHER "R", EVEN THOUGH IT WAS SPELLED CORRECTLY IN MY POST, SO LEMME GUESS, YOU CAN'T READ NOW EITHER?!) STOP BOTHERING THESE PEOPLE. IF YOU'RE GONNA POST SOMETHING, MAKE IT CIVILIZED. YOU DON'T HAVE TO ASSAULT EVERYONE WHO HAPPENS TO DISAGREE WITH YOU. LIKE YOU SAID, YOU'RE POSTING ON YOUR VIEWPOINT AND YOU ARE DEMANDING RESPECT FROM OTHERS. WHY NOT GIVE THEM THE SAME RESPECT? (and my ALL CAPS posting isn't to make a POINT, it's just what I'm used to---are we gonna start another argument because YOU don't "agree" with me?) Lighten up will ya?



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Newsgroup ]

Main Menu | Recipesearch | Newsgroups | Rumbles & Murmurs | Culinary Careers
QuickMeals | Secret Ingredients | Help Wanteds | Archives | Feedback

Copyright © 1998 StarChefs. All rights reserved.